🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". The policy may be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good first step," said one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, interest built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization set up by the family of a girl who died after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the local level due to national stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some individuals to copy this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.